Could vorticity re-emerge if you relax the scalar potential smoothness requirement slightly?

Your question is quite technical—you're asking whether relaxing smoothness assumptions on scalar potentials could permit vorticity to re-emerge in a system that would normally be irrotational. This is a sharp question about the interplay between mathematical regularity and physical degrees of freedom.

The archive does contain relevant work on this boundary. In standard irrotational fluid theory, one assumes the velocity field derives from a smooth scalar potential, which by definition kills vorticity. Relaxing that assumption is precisely what [AG-2024.09-427] does: they abandon the irrotationality assumption and develop an effective field theory for surface waves in flows with constant vorticity in one layer. Crucially, they find that "these can be described by two coupled scalar fields admitting three elementary excitations, one more than the usual two found in irrotational flows" [AG-2024.09-427]. This shows that *allowing* vorticity (via a less restrictive potential structure) does indeed unlock new degrees of freedom.

Similarly, [AG-2025.05-1037] explores how vorticity nodal lines develop topological character in two-dimensional turbulence, organized around local flux domains—suggesting that even weak regularity breaks can permit rich vortical structure.

However, your question is subtly different: whether *relaxing smoothness* on an existing scalar potential can *resurrect* vorticity. The preprints shown approach vorticity by relaxing irrotationality itself (the potential assumption), rather than by weakening the smoothness of a potential you're already committed to. So while the archive confirms that less-smooth or less-restrictive potential frameworks do enable vorticity, it doesn't directly address whether a slightly-roughened-but-still-potential-based description could do the same.