Since there's no actual science answer to generate follow-ups from, I can't apply the rules as intended (grounding in content, opening new angles on the science, avoiding rephrasing).

I notice the preprints you've provided are about evaluating AI systems on physics questions—not about frontier physics itself (propulsion, relativity, mathematical physics). None of them directly address a substantive science question from a reader.

Could you share a concrete question about physics, propulsion, or mathematical science? For instance: *"How might spacetime curvature relate to proposed antigravity mechanisms?"* or *"What's the current experimental status of claims about inertial mass modification?"* Then I can ground an answer in the archive.