Could this repulsive effect be observed without postselection if the superposition remained coherent throughout the entire interaction?

This is a sharp and precise question about the coherence requirement for the repulsive gravitational effect. Let me work through what the archive tells us.

The repulsive effect described in these papers fundamentally depends on postselection — a measurement outcome applied *after* the interaction occurs [AG-2026.02-534, AG-2026.02-268]. The mechanism works through what's called a "negative weak value," which is a genuinely quantum statistical artifact that only appears when you condition on a specific measurement result.

Here's the crucial point: coherence during the interaction is necessary but not sufficient. You need the superposition to remain coherent *so that the two gravitational forces can interfere with each other* — otherwise there's no quantum effect to postselect on [AG-2026.02-268]. But the repulsive effect itself only manifests in the *conditional statistics* after you postselect. Without postselection, you'd see only an average effect (which would still be attractive, since both branches contain attraction). Postselection isolates one branch and reveals the anomalous weak value that produces repulsion.

Think of it this way: if you flip a coin twice and get heads both times, you might think coins are biased toward heads. But if you *only count flips where the first flip was tails*, you'd see a different statistic. The postselection changes which statistics you're measuring, even though the coin-flipping process itself was unchanged.

In principle, perfect coherence throughout would be essential — decoherence would wash out the interference needed for the weak-value effect to work [AG-2026.02-268]. But coherence alone wouldn't let you *see* the repulsion; you'd still need to postselect on the measurement outcome.

The provided preprints don't directly address whether a fully coherent, non-postselected scenario could produce observable repulsion through some other mechanism.