Is negative mass physically possible?

Negative mass is one of the most intriguing questions in physics, but the preprints provided don't directly address whether it's physically possible. Let me explain what we do know from related concepts in these papers.

The closest relevant idea appears in [AG-2025.03-352], which discusses "negative energy" in the context of quantum field violations of the null energy condition. Quantum mechanics does allow for temporary, localized regions of negative energy density—this is well-established theoretically. However, there's a crucial constraint: a limit exists on how much negative energy can accumulate over time and space [AG-2025.03-352]. This "smeared null energy condition" acts as a semilocal bound, preventing macroscopic accumulation of negative energy.

Negative mass (as opposed to negative energy density) is a distinct question. If such a thing existed as a stable, classical object, it would violate momentum conservation and lead to runaway instabilities—a particle with negative mass repelled by gravity would accelerate infinitely. No stable negative-mass objects have ever been observed, and theoretical frameworks that allow them typically require exotic boundary conditions or violations of fundamental symmetries.

The papers here explore unconventional matter (Q-balls, tachyons, deviant dark matter sources) but don't make a case for literal negative mass. [AG-2025.05-075] does discuss "deviant matter" that attracts normal matter without being attracted itself—a violation of momentum conservation—but frames this as a breakdown of diffeomorphism invariance rather than negative mass proper.

The provided preprints don't directly address whether negative mass is physically possible.