Do major cloud providers' adoption timelines for Kyber and Dilithium drive when indie studios must upgrade?

Your question asks about supply-chain timing: whether major cloud providers' migration schedules for post-quantum cryptography standards (Kyber for key encapsulation, Dilithium for digital signatures) force smaller studios to follow suit.

The provided preprints don't address this question. They cover quantum computing infrastructure, QKD networks, and hybrid algorithm scheduling—but not the adoption timelines, vendor pressure, or market dependencies around post-quantum cryptography migration for indie software studios.

To answer your question properly, you'd need sources discussing NIST standardization rollout timelines [AG-2024.05-2225 mentions that Kyber and Dilithium are quantum-safe algorithms now standardized], major cloud provider migration deadlines (AWS, Google Cloud, Azure), and whether those deadlines cascade to smaller developers through library deprecation, API changes, or compliance requirements. That ecosystem story isn't captured here.