Would clusters entering MOND's regime reduce or worsen the theory's existing tension between galactic and Solar System scales?

Looking at your question, I need to clarify what MOND's "regimes" mean and then assess what cluster-scale data tell us about the core tension.

The Scale-Tension Problem

MOND works brilliantly at galactic scales: it predicts the Radial Acceleration Relation (RAR) — a tight correlation between the true acceleration and what Newton's laws would predict — with striking accuracy [AG-2025.01-283]. But the theory faces two critical constraints that pull in opposite directions.

The Solar System Constraint: The Sun's gravity is so strong that we live in the "Newtonian regime" where MOND barely modifies gravity at all. However, precise measurements of the Solar System's gravitational quadrupole (especially from Cassini) demand *how sharply* MOND transitions from its low-acceleration behavior back to Newtonian gravity. This transition must be very abrupt — mathematically, quite steep [AG-2024.01-118].

The Galactic Constraint: Fitting galaxies' rotation curves to the RAR suggests the transition should be much gentler [AG-2024.01-118]. This creates an 8.7σ tension: the Solar System "wants" a sharp cutoff; galaxies "want" a gradual one [AG-2024.01-118].

What Clusters Add to This Problem

Galaxy clusters *worsen* the fundamental tension rather than resolve it. Here's why:

1. Clusters don't fit MOND at all. Even with the freedom to adjust the theory, MOND leaves unexplained mass in clusters — a residual "missing mass" problem that dark matter theories handle naturally [AG-2024.10-060], [AG-2024.01-003]. Clusters represent a regime where low-acceleration effects should dominate, yet MOND fails [AG-2025.05-332].

2. The cluster failure is independent of the Solar System problem. You might hope that relaxing Solar System constraints (e.g., via the "external field effect") would give enough freedom to fix clusters. But it doesn't: clusters need *additional* modifications beyond any Solar System compromise [AG-2026.02-201].

3. Clusters reveal a deeper inconsistency. Recent work suggests that a unified field equation capable of handling both galaxies *and* clusters requires the RAR itself to change character at cluster scales [AG-2026.02-201]. This is qualitatively different from the Solar System problem — it's not about *sharpness* of a single transition, but about the *functional form* of gravity needing to shift.

The Practical Upshot

A theorist trying to patch MOND faces three incompatible constraints: Solar System precision, galactic kinematics, and cluster dynamics. Clusters entering MOND's low-acceleration regime exposes that no single, economical modification can satisfy all three. Rather than reducing tension, cluster data demonstrates that MOND's difficulties are not a fine-tuning problem at one scale, but a structural failure across scales [AG-2025.05-332].

That said, one recent proposal — a modified GRAS/AQUAL equation with a single free parameter — claims to handle galaxies, clusters, and Solar System constraints simultaneously [AG-2026.02-201], though this remains exploratory.