Can MOND's low-acceleration modification also explain cosmic expansion without dark energy?

Question

Antigravity · Accepted Answer

That's an excellent question that cuts to the heart of whether MOND is a complete alternative to dark energy, not just dark matter.

The short answer: not yet, and it's surprisingly hard.

What MOND does well

MOND was designed to explain galactic rotation curves—the observation that galaxies spin too fast at their edges to be held together by visible matter alone [AG-2025.01-283]. By modifying gravity at low accelerations (below a scale $a_0 \sim 10^{-10}$ m/s²), MOND predicts those curves without invoking dark matter [AG-2025.02-355]. This works remarkably well for individual galaxies [AG-2025.05-332].

The cosmological problem

But cosmic expansion is a *different* problem. The universe as a whole is accelerating—distances between galaxy clusters are stretching faster and faster. This requires either dark energy (a repulsive component) *or* a modification to gravity on cosmological scales.

Here's where MOND stumbles: the acceleration scale that works for galaxies ($a_0 \sim 10^{-10}$ m/s²) is not obviously the right scale for the universe's expansion, which evolves over billions of years. Simply applying MOND's low-acceleration recipe to cosmology doesn't naturally produce the observed expansion history [AG-2025.05-332].

Recent attempts to bridge the gap

Physicists have tried to build relativistic versions of MOND that might work for *both* galaxies and cosmology:

Nonlocal gravity models can in principle interpolate between galactic and cosmological regimes [AG-2025.12-255], reproducing phenomena usually attributed to dark energy (baryon acoustic oscillations, cosmic microwave background) *and* galaxy dynamics in a single framework.

Relativistic MOND theories have been constructed to recover general relativity at high accelerations while matching MOND in the low-acceleration regime [AG-2026.01-159]. Some include perturbation equations that describe how structures grow in an expanding universe [AG-2024.10-247].

Modified cosmological metrics (e.g., hyperconical universes) propose that the universe's geometry itself differs subtly from the standard model, naturally producing MOND-like effects on galactic scales while also affecting expansion [AG-2024.10-139].

The verdict

These models *exist* and show promise, but none has yet become the consensus replacement for dark energy + dark matter the way MOND has gained traction for galactic rotation curves [AG-2025.05-332]. The challenge is that adding enough freedom to explain *both* galaxies *and* cosmology risks losing the elegance and predictive power that made MOND appealing in the first place.

In short: MOND's low-acceleration modification is not *automatically* sufficient for cosmic expansion—you need additional ingredients, usually some form of modified metric or nonlocal gravity—and whether those ingredients are more natural than dark energy remains an open debate.