Antigravity Q&A
Can ADM mass decrease over time like Bondi mass does during radiation?
Answered by claude-haiku-4-5 · 30 May 2026
Answer
Great question—it gets at a fundamental distinction between two celebrated mass definitions in general relativity.
ADM vs. Bondi Mass: A Key Difference
The short answer is no, ADM mass does not decrease during radiation in the way Bondi mass does [AG-2025.03-718]. To understand why, you need to know what each measures.
ADM mass is defined at spatial infinity in an asymptotically flat spacetime. It's a global property: the total energy of the entire system, measured from infinitely far away. Think of it as the mass you'd infer if you watched the gravitational field's geometry from far outside [AG-2025.03-718].
Bondi mass, by contrast, is measured at *null infinity*—along the light cone where radiation escapes. As gravitational waves or Hawking radiation carry energy away, the Bondi mass decreases because you're directly accounting for energy flux leaving the system [AG-2025.03-718]. It's quasi-local: it captures mass/energy flowing past a sphere at infinity.
Why ADM Stays Constant (Usually)
The crucial insight is that ADM mass is *conserved* in isolated systems—it doesn't decrease as radiation escapes. Instead, the ADM mass of the whole system (black hole *plus* radiation field) remains constant; what changes is how that fixed ADM energy is *distributed* between the collapsing object and the outgoing radiation [AG-2025.03-718].
In 2D semiclassical gravity with Hawking radiation, the story is more nuanced. The Bondi mass decreases monotonically (stays non-increasing and positive), while the relationship between ADM and Bondi masses involves a correction term accounting for the change in reference frames as the system radiates away [AG-2025.10-416]. But in ordinary 4D general relativity, ADM mass is a conserved global quantity.
The Physical Takeaway
If you observe a black hole evaporating, Bondi mass gives you the "local" sense that the object is losing mass in real time. ADM mass tells you the universe's total energy budget is unchanged—energy is just being converted from gravitational binding energy into outgoing radiation [AG-2025.10-416].
Sources · 8
- 59%astro-ph.COThe Bondi universe: Can negative mass drive the cosmological expansion?AG-2026.01-618
- 57%gr-qcThe Measure of a MassAG-2025.03-718
- 56%gr-qcQuantum-Corrected Bondi Mass for 2D Hawking RadiationAG-2025.10-416
- 56%gr-qcMasses dynamics during black hole evaporation in spatially flat FLRW universesAG-2025.08-026
- 55%gr-qcCosmology with the matter component decaying faster than radiationAG-2024.12-179
- 55%gr-qcFaster rate of Hawking radiation in modified gravity constraining dark matterAG-2024.11-551
- 54%gr-qcMass (re)distribution for quantum dust cores of black holesAG-2025.01-459
- 54%gr-qcSimilarity in the Arnowitt-Deser-Misner Mass from Brill and Teukolsky Initial Data Sets Beyond the Linear ApproximationAG-2024.09-109
Keep exploring
- How does the energy density distribution shift between the black hole and radiation field as ADM stays constant?
- Does Bondi mass decreasing imply the spacetime stops being asymptotically flat at null infinity?
- In 2D semiclassical gravity, what physical mechanism causes the ADM-Bondi mass correction term to evolve?
This is a research aid — not a peer review. Verify sources before citing.