How do local isometries constrain which field redefinitions preserve stress-tensor locality without spoiling it?

This is a sophisticated question about the interplay between symmetry, locality, and field redefinitions in quantum field theory—especially in curved spacetime. The archive does address pieces of this puzzle, though not all in one place.

Local isometries and stress-tensor locality

The key constraint comes from the relationship between local isometries and the stress–energy tensor itself. When a spacetime admits local isometries (infinitesimal diffeomorphisms that preserve the metric), the stress-energy tensor must respond in a controlled way: it should be a *local* operator, meaning its expectation value depends only on the metric and its derivatives at that point, not on the field configuration far away [AG-2025.08-648, AG-2025.08-649].

This matters because local isometries are how gravity "talks" to quantum fields—they generate the diffeomorphisms under which the metric and fields must transform consistently. If a field redefinition breaks the implementability of local isometries, it corrupts this coupling [AG-2025.08-648].

Field redefinitions and observable preservation

Field redefinitions themselves are subtle. The general principle, proven at the classical level, is that certain observables remain independent of which field variables you use, provided you track the redefinition consistently through to your choice of boundary conditions and initial data [AG-2024.08-571]. This is a classical analogue to the LSZ reduction formula in quantum field theory.

The catch: non-invertible redefinitions can destroy solutions (like solitons) and break the physical equivalence of different field parametrizations [AG-2024.08-571]. For stress-tensor locality to survive a redefinition, you must ensure the redefinition is invertible *within the domain where the stress tensor is defined as a local operator*.

The geometric resolution

Recent work suggests a geometric way out: when you deform a QFT by its stress tensor, the non-locality can be repackaged as locality on a *curved background* that the deformation itself generates [AG-2026.03-202, AG-2025.08-422]. In this framework, the stress tensor becomes local not in the original flat (or reference) metric, but in the saddle-point metric determined by coupling to gravity. The redefinition that preserves locality is precisely the one that respects the Einstein equations of the emergent geometry.

In short: local isometries constrain field redefinitions by requiring that the stress-energy tensor remain implementable as a local operator. Redefinitions that break this must be either invertible with compatible boundary conditions [AG-2024.08-571], or they must be accompanied by a metric redefinition that captures the resulting non-locality as locality in a deformed geometry [AG-2026.03-202, AG-2025.08-422].

---

The archive does not contain a dedicated treatment of which specific algebraic conditions on redefinitions (e.g., functional derivatives, Jacobian structure) are *necessary and sufficient* to preserve stress-tensor locality—that gap may be worth pursuing in the literature beyond these papers.