Could game developers adopt post-quantum algorithms without compromising network latency?

Your question is about practical performance rather than security, which is important—but these preprints focus on cryptographic algorithms themselves, not on how they perform in live network conditions like those game servers require.

Here's what the archive does tell us: Post-quantum algorithms like Kyber and Dilithium [AG-2024.05-2225] are designed to be quantum-resistant, and they're being considered for deployment in real systems. The challenge you're asking about—whether they can work *without slowing down networks*—sits at the intersection of two constraints: quantum safety versus computational cost. One preprint acknowledges this explicitly: "practical solutions are a compromise between the performance and complexity of the implementation" [AG-2024.03-2172], and another notes that legacy industrial systems face "a trade-off between the security of the communications and the amortization of the industrial infrastructure" [AG-2024.01-1401]. These observations suggest latency trade-offs exist, but the archive doesn't contain detailed benchmarks of packet encryption/decryption times in gaming scenarios or specific comparisons of post-quantum vs. classical latency overhead for real-time applications.

To answer your question properly, you'd want papers measuring encryption round-trip times, key establishment latency, and computational overhead per-packet for post-quantum schemes on commodity hardware under gaming network loads—which aren't in this collection.