Can discrete automata with conservation laws actually achieve true quantum superposition, or only mimic its statistical effects?

Your question hinges on a deep distinction: whether discrete automata can instantiate genuine quantum superposition (where a system truly exists in multiple states simultaneously) or merely reproduce quantum statistics through classical randomness.

What the archive shows

The preprints reveal a surprising answer: the boundary is subtler than the question assumes.

[AG-2024.05-2105] demonstrates that probabilistic cellular automata with conservation laws exhibit genuine quantum-like features—periodic revivals and wave-function descriptions—not merely as statistical mimicry but as *emergent properties of the dynamics themselves*. The key insight is that when you average over random initial conditions and random scattering events, the system's collective behavior obeys Schrödinger-like evolution, complete with energy eigenstates.

However, [AG-2024.01-1637] reveals the tension: a discrete deterministic cellular automaton built from permutations of ontological states (real, local configurations) *cannot generate superposition by construction*—yet when you slightly perturb it to match the Dirac equation, superpositions inevitably emerge. This suggests superposition is not baked into discrete automata; it arises when the system is embedded in a richer mathematical structure.

[AG-2024.08-616] offers a reconciliation: quantum mechanics can be embedded as a *subsystem* of a classical probabilistic system with a real-valued action. A unitary evolution of wave functions emerges from an overall probability distribution, meaning superposition is a coarse-grained description of an underlying classical stochastic reality—not a fundamental feature of the discrete automaton itself.

The practical upshot

Discrete automata can *reproduce all statistical predictions* of quantum mechanics through conservation laws and averaging [AG-2024.04-2319]. Whether this constitutes "true" superposition depends on your interpretation: if you mean "does the microscopic automaton state genuinely occupy multiple configurations at once," the answer appears to be no—the automaton occupies one state per time step. But if you mean "do observable quantum properties (interference, entanglement, energy-momentum statistics) emerge faithfully," the answer is yes.

The provided preprints don't directly address whether automata can achieve superposition in the philosophical sense (e.g., ontological vs. epistemic), only how it emerges in the mathematics.