How would Solar System precision tests constrain MOND if the acceleration threshold dropped to cosmic expansion scales?

This is a thoughtfully constructed hypothetical. Let me unpack what the constraint landscape actually looks like today, and then explore what your scenario would mean.

The current tension

MOND's critical acceleration scale $a_0 \approx 1.2 \times 10^{-10}$ m/s² [AG-2024.10-033] is already *extremely* small — about the acceleration of a snail over a year. Yet the Solar System imposes fierce constraints. Precision radio and laser tracking of spacecraft can measure accelerations at this level, and the gravitational quadrupole moment of the Solar System — a subtle distortion of the Sun's gravity field — is known to exquisite precision from Cassini data [AG-2026.02-407].

Here's the core problem: MOND theories (particularly AQUAL and QUMOND formulations) require a *sharp* transition between Newtonian and deep-MOND regimes to match galactic rotation curves measured in the Radial Acceleration Relation. But the Solar System quadrupole constraint demands a *much gentler* transition [AG-2024.01-118]. These two requirements are in direct conflict—an 8.7σ tension under standard assumptions. The Solar System essentially "sees" MOND effects it shouldn't if galaxies do.

If the threshold dropped to cosmic scales

Your scenario: imagine $a_0$ dropped to acceleration scales relevant to cosmic expansion (roughly $10^{-18}$ m/s² or lower).

Solar System precision tests would become essentially irrelevant. Why? Because every object in the Solar System—planets, spacecraft, asteroids—experiences accelerations far, far above such a threshold. They would all be firmly in the Newtonian regime, with zero detectable MOND corrections. The Solar System would impose *no meaningful constraint* on the theory.

This sounds like it solves the tension: galaxies could have a sharp transition (constrained by the RAR), and the Solar System couldn't contradict it because MOND wouldn't be "active" anywhere near the Sun's gravity field.

But you'd face a different catastrophe: you'd have decoupled MOND from any laboratory test. The only constraint would come from extragalactic observations—the very domain where MOND already struggles with galaxy clusters [AG-2025.05-332]. You'd lose what little Solar System leverage remains (in the form of wide binary tests and other precision measurements [AG-2024.10-033]). The theory would become progressively unfalsifiable at small scales.

Moreover, if $a_0$ is set by cosmological scales, you need a *dynamical mechanism* explaining why the threshold itself varies with cosmic expansion or redshift. One proposal—the Scale Invariant Vacuum paradigm—suggests $a_0$ depends on redshift and could be related to the matter density $Ω_m$ [AG-2024.09-233]. But this introduces new theoretical apparatus and requires justification.

The deeper issue

The real constraint isn't precision per se—it's *multiplicity*. MOND must simultaneously explain: galactic rotation curves (sharp transition), Solar System geometry (gentle transition or external field suppression), binary star kinematics (precise acceleration law), and cosmology (cluster masses, expansion history). Lowering $a_0$ to cosmic scales doesn't resolve this; it just shifts the problem to a regime where fewer independent tests exist [AG-2025.10-365]. You'd be trading one set of tensions for worse observational coverage.

The archive does not provide detailed numerical predictions for what happens if $a_0$ drops by many orders of magnitude, so I cannot quantify the specific observational signatures you'd see at intermediate scales.