Antigravity Q&A
Could precision measurements of τ→μγ at future muon colliders eventually surpass quark FCNC sensitivity?
Answered by claude-haiku-4-5 · 9 May 2026
Answer
Your question asks whether precision measurements of the rare decay τ→μγ could eventually beat the sensitivity of top-quark flavor-changing neutral currents (FCNC) at future colliders.
The short answer is: the preprints don't directly compare τ→μγ sensitivity to top-quark FCNC sensitivity, so I can't definitively answer whether one will surpass the other. But I can sketch what we know about each.
Top-quark FCNC sensitivity at muon colliders
A 10 TeV muon collider can probe top-quark FCNC couplings—specifically the anomalous tqZ and tqγ interactions—to a level of $\mathcal{O}(10^{-3})$ in the coupling strength, corresponding to branching ratios of $\mathcal{O}(10^{-6})$ for rare decays like t→qγ [AG-2026.04-1184]. This improves current LHC limits by more than one order of magnitude. An FCC-μp collider can push branching-ratio sensitivity to $\mathcal{O}(10^{-5})$ for t→qγ processes [AG-2024.10-1425].
Tau-lepton dipole-moment sensitivity
The tau's anomalous magnetic moment $a_τ$ (which parametrizes the τ→μγ-like process) can be probed at future muon colliders through Drell-Yan pair production and vector-boson-fusion channels to a sensitivity of $\mathcal{O}(10^{-5}-10^{-4})$ [AG-2024.10-1276]. Multi-TeV muon colliders can extend bounds by several orders of magnitude over current constraints [AG-2026.04-1198]. An LHC-based strategy using photon fusion predicts sensitivity of order $10^{-3}$ [AG-2024.03-1055].
The comparison problem
These numbers describe *different* things: top FCNC couplings live in the top-quark sector and probe quark mixing; tau dipole moments probe lepton physics and Standard Model tests in the third generation. Surpassing one with the other would require either (1) a direct process coupling them—which doesn't exist in the Standard Model—or (2) assuming new physics that links them. The preprints don't explore whether such a connection exists or how competitive these sensitivities really are in practice.
The provided preprints don't directly benchmark τ→μγ measurements against top-FCNC searches.
Sources · 8
- 74%hep-phSensitivity to top-quark FCNC interactions at future muon collidersAG-2026.04-1184
- 73%hep-phProbing $τ$ lepton dipole moments at future Muon CollidersAG-2024.10-1276
- 73%hep-phProbing the Tau Anomalous Magnetic Moment at Colliders: From Ultra-Peripheral Collisions to the Precision FrontierAG-2026.04-1300
- 72%hep-phProbing $τ$ lepton dipole moments at future Lepton CollidersAG-2026.04-1198
- 70%hep-phSensitivity analysis for the anomalous $tqγ$ couplings via $ γq {\rightarrow} t γ$ subprocess in photon-proton collisions at the FCC-$μ$pAG-2024.10-1425
- 70%hep-phTop quark FCNC in Randall-Sundrum models: post-LHC allowed rates and searches at $e^+e^-$ and $μ^+ μ^-$ collidersAG-2026.01-1272
- 70%hep-phQuantum tomography with $τ$ leptons at the FCC-eeAG-2024.05-1299
- 70%hep-phStrategy to measure tau $g-2$ via photon fusion in LHC proton collisionsAG-2024.03-1055
Keep exploring
- How would tau dipole sensitivity constrain beyond-Standard-Model particles that also generate top FCNC?
- Does τ→μγ branching ratio scale differently with new physics mass scales than top quark FCNC?
- Why haven't collider studies directly compared lepton dipole precision to quark flavor-changing neutral current reach?
This is a research aid — not a peer review. Verify sources before citing.