How do nonadiabatic hopping rates change if the crack propagates faster than electronic relaxation timescales?

Your question touches on a genuinely subtle problem in molecular dynamics: what happens to nonadiabatic hopping (transitions between electronic surfaces) when structural changes outpace the quantum system's ability to relax?

The short answer is that the archives don't directly address crack propagation. However, the physics of "fast processes outrunning relaxation" is central to these preprints, and I can translate that logic to your scenario.

The relaxation timescale problem

When a process evolves faster than the system can thermalize or dephase, nonadiabatic hopping rates typically *increase* because the electron spends less time "locked in" to a single surface. [AG-2024.05-2033] shows that the nonadiabatic rate depends directly on vibrational relaxation and dephasing rates—the system's ability to dissipate energy. If those channels are too slow to keep up with structural change, electrons cannot equilibrate between surfaces, and transitions become more probable.

More concretely: [AG-2024.01-1327] found that decoherence of electronic coherence (loss of superposition between states) happens in femtoseconds, driven by momentum separation of nuclear wavepackets on different electronic surfaces. If your crack propagates *faster* than this decoherence timescale, the electronic system never settles into a well-defined adiabatic state, leading to enhanced nonadiabatic coupling and higher hopping rates.

The general principle

[AG-2024.02-1574] and [AG-2024.02-1973] both emphasize that nonadiabatic transitions become functionally important precisely when nuclear motion is rapid relative to electronic relaxation—the hallmark of a non-adiabatic regime. Your fast-crack scenario would be an extreme case of this: the Born-Oppenheimer approximation (which assumes electrons instantly adapt to nuclear geometry) breaks down, and the electron density cannot "follow" the crack front smoothly.

The practical consequence: hopping rates would not obey the usual quasi-exponential energy-gap law [AG-2024.05-2033], and you'd need open-quantum-system methods that explicitly track both relaxation *and* driving speed.

The provided preprints don't directly model crack propagation or its coupling to electronic hopping.