If quirks carry fractional charge, would their radius of curvature still follow classical equations?

Your question asks whether quarks (I assume you meant "quarks," not "quirks") with fractional electric charge would follow classical trajectory equations—specifically the radius of curvature in a magnetic field.

The short answer: in principle, yes, but only if you treat them as point particles *and* stay in regimes where quantum and relativistic effects don't dominate.

Here's why it's subtle:

The classical baseline. In classical electromagnetism, any charged particle curving through a magnetic field follows the Lorentz force law: the radius of curvature scales as $r = \frac{mv}{qB}$ (momentum divided by charge times field). The fractional charge (say, $q = e/3$ for an up quark) just means a smaller denominator—the quark curves *more* sharply than an electron of the same momentum in the same field. Nothing breaks the classical picture on dimensional grounds.

Where it breaks down. Quarks are never observed as free particles—they're confined inside hadrons by the strong nuclear force. But more fundamentally, at the scales where you'd need to ask this question (inside a nucleon, roughly 10^−15 meters), quantum mechanics dominates. The notion of a classical trajectory with a well-defined radius doesn't really apply; you'd need quantum field theory instead.

The finite-size problem. A deeper issue is whether a point charge—even a fractionally charged one—is physically meaningful. The archive contains work on nonlinear electrodynamics that addresses this: [AG-2025.10-820] shows how to construct theories where the effective radius of a point charge can be tuned arbitrarily small while keeping self-energy finite, circumventing the classical problem of infinite self-energy for point particles. If quarks aren't truly pointlike but have some structure, their curvature in a field might deviate from the classical formula at very high precision—but we don't know their true size experimentally.

Bottom line: Classical trajectory formulas *would* work for a hypothetical fractionally charged point particle in a weak enough field and over short enough times. But quarks are confined, quantum, and possibly composite, so the question is mostly academic—you can't isolate a quark to test this.

The provided preprints don't directly address quark trajectories or fractional charges in magnetic fields.