How do muon-to-electron conversion sensitivities compare to loop-induced g−2 anomalies in constraining new physics?

This is a rich question that touches on two distinct experimental windows into physics beyond the Standard Model. Let me walk through how they compare as new-physics probes.

The Two Messengers

Muon-to-electron conversion (μ→e conversion in nuclei) and the muon's anomalous magnetic moment (g−2) are sensitive to different kinds of new particles and interactions, and that's their main virtue—they're complementary.

Muon-to-electron conversion is a charged lepton flavor violation process: a muon captured on a nucleus converts to an electron without any neutrino. This is forbidden in the Standard Model but can happen if new physics couples muons and electrons together [AG-2024.12-1328]. The experimental limit is expected to improve by four orders of magnitude in the coming years [AG-2024.12-1328], making this an exceptionally clean probe.

The muon g−2 anomaly, by contrast, doesn't violate lepton flavor. Instead, it measures a tiny deviation in the muon's spin-related magnetic properties, thought to arise from quantum loops involving new particles [AG-2026.02-1153]. The current discrepancy between experiment and Standard Model prediction sits at roughly 5σ [AG-2024.08-914].

Why They're Complementary, Not Directly Comparable

Different operator types: Muon conversion primarily constrains four-fermion operators that mix leptons with quarks—especially at the nuclear scale [AG-2026.03-1286]. The g−2 anomaly, being a dipole moment, is sensitive to penguin diagrams and box diagrams at the loop level. A new particle that affects one may barely touch the other.

Different mass reach: Loop-induced g−2 is exquisitely sensitive to *light* new physics—especially sub-GeV particles like axions or hidden-sector bosons—because the loop integral is logarithmically soft [AG-2026.02-1153]. Muon conversion, because it involves nuclear bound states and screening effects, probes a somewhat different mass window and operator structure [AG-2024.12-1328].

Quantifying Sensitivity Improvements

The g−2 anomaly currently constrains new physics at the ~10−10 level of precision [AG-2024.04-1119]. Over the next decade, muon conversion sensitivity will improve *four orders of magnitude* [AG-2024.12-1328]—potentially reaching sensitivities that g−2 cannot access in certain operator directions.

A concrete example: the $L_μ − L_τ$ model (a new gauge symmetry coupling muons and tau leptons) can explain the g−2 anomaly via a light Z′ boson, and was recently tested by the NA64 experiment [AG-2024.04-1119]. But this same model would produce specific signatures in muon conversion experiments, offering a cross-check.

Which Is the "Better" Probe?

Neither. They constrain orthogonal slices of new-physics parameter space. The g−2 anomaly is more sensitive to loop-level, chirality-flipping interactions in light-mass regimes; muon conversion is more sensitive to contact interactions and four-fermion operators. A comprehensive search for new physics uses both [AG-2026.02-1153].

The preprints don't directly quantify a sensitivity ratio between these two observables, so a detailed numerical comparison would require looking beyond this archive.