Can photonic switching between distributed modules eliminate crosstalk entirely, or just reduce it?

# Photonic Switching and Crosstalk: Reduction, Not Elimination

Crosstalk in photonic switching networks can be *dramatically reduced* but not entirely eliminated—and the evidence shows why complete elimination is physically unrealistic.

What the experiments show

The most direct evidence comes from trapped-ion quantum computing, where crosstalk between addressed ions is a critical bottleneck. A silicon nitride waveguide chip designed for ion addressing achieved optical crosstalk suppression of 50.8 dB between adjacent outputs [AG-2024.06-2269], meaning the unwanted light reaching a neighboring ion is roughly 100,000 times weaker than the intended signal. That's extraordinary performance—yet still not zero.

More remarkably, researchers demonstrated *active cancellation* of crosstalk by sending deliberately phase-matched "anti-crosstalk" light through neighboring channels [AG-2024.06-1727]. They suppressed crosstalk intensity by a factor of >1000 and the resulting gate errors by >100×. But here's the key: they had to *continuously calibrate* this cancellation to account for phase drifts in the optical paths. This tells us the cancellation is real but fragile—it requires active stabilization and can never be perfectly static.

Why complete elimination is fundamentally hard

Several physical mechanisms create crosstalk that can only be reduced, not killed:

1. Diffraction: Light spreads as it propagates; you can't confine a beam perfectly to one ion or module [AG-2024.06-1727].

2. Waveguide coupling: In integrated photonic circuits, adjacent waveguides inevitably couple electromagnetically, leaking photons between channels [AG-2024.06-1727].

3. Component imperfections: Real switching networks (Mach-Zehnder interferometers, cavities) have finite extinction ratios and losses [AG-2024.05-2108].

4. Thermal and phase drift: Even if you design perfect cancellation, environmental fluctuations constantly degrade it [AG-2024.06-1727].

The practical frontier

For *distributed quantum computing*, the question shifts from "zero crosstalk" to "is crosstalk small enough?" Experiments distributing algorithms across modules separated by meters have achieved 86% fidelity with photonic interconnects [AG-2024.06-2424], suggesting current crosstalk reduction is adequate for near-term applications. But scaling to many more modules will require both better passive design (waveguide isolation, cavity engineering) *and* active feedback schemes.

The bottom line: photonic switching can reduce crosstalk to negligible levels for practical purposes, but the physical universe doesn't permit true elimination. Success means engineering it away faster than it accumulates.