How do QEIs change if you average negative energy over curved paths versus straight geodesics?

Your question asks about a specific technical comparison—how quantum energy inequalities (QEIs) behave when you average negative energy over curved paths versus straight geodesics. This is a natural follow-up to thinking about QEIs in curved spacetime, but the provided preprints don't directly address this comparison.

Here's what the archive does contain on QEIs:

QEIs in general: Quantum energy inequalities are constraints on how negative the renormalized energy density of a quantum field can be when averaged over a path [AG-2024.05-173]. They're important precisely because quantum fields *can* violate the classical energy conditions—they can have regions of negative energy—but QEIs cap how much and for how long.

The standard case: QEIs in the literature control renormalized negative energies averaged over a geodesic [AG-2024.05-173]. This is the baseline. The question of whether the average changes for a *curved path* (not a geodesic) compared to a *straight geodesic* between the same two points is physically interesting—it would tell you whether the path geometry itself modifies the constraint—but I don't see that comparison worked out in these preprints.

Related context on geodesics and quantum corrections: There is recent work on how geodesics themselves are modified by quantum gravity [AG-2026.01-638, AG-2025.09-659], which could in principle affect how QEI averages behave, but neither paper directly couples that to QEI calculations.

Extension to non-commutative spacetimes: One paper extends QEIs to non-commutative quantum field theories [AG-2025.03-1297], but that's a different geometric generalization than comparing path-shape effects.

The specific comparison you're asking for—QEI bounds on straight versus curved non-geodesic paths—isn't covered in these preprints.