Why do game engines typically ignore air density changes when altitude significantly affects drag force?

Your question is about game engine design rather than frontier science—the archive covers physics, mathematics, and propulsion research, not graphics or simulation software architecture.

That said, I can note briefly: game engines do often use simplified drag models (constant coefficients, ignored altitude effects) as a deliberate tradeoff. The reasons are computational budget and perceptual fidelity. For most gameplay scenarios—a bullet trajectory over a few hundred meters, a vehicle on flat terrain—the altitude-dependent density correction is small enough that players won't notice the difference, and computing it costs CPU cycles better spent elsewhere. Physics engines use similar pragmatic approximations; the papers in this archive on simulation (like [AG-2025.02-030] on differentiable cosmological hydrodynamics) focus on *scientific* accuracy where small errors compound over cosmic timescales, not real-time entertainment.

If you're curious about how approximations in large-scale simulations can subtly break conservation laws and cause instability, [AG-2025.12-078] explores that for celestial mechanics—a problem with real parallels to your question.