Why are τ→μγ and μ→eγ measurements less sensitive probes than their quark-sector equivalents for ruling out new physics?

This is a sharp question about effective field theory sensitivity—and the provided preprints mostly illustrate *improved* tau and muon measurements rather than explaining the core sensitivity difference. Let me work from first principles.

Why lepton decays lag behind quark transitions

The key difference lies in loop suppression and the flavor structure of the Standard Model.

Processes like τ→μγ and μ→eγ are flavor-changing neutral currents (FCNCs) in the lepton sector. In the Standard Model, they're forbidden at tree level and can only occur through loop diagrams involving W bosons and neutrinos. This introduces two penalties:

1. Loop suppression: Each loop carries a factor of α/(4π) ≈ 10⁻³, making the amplitude tiny.

2. Unitarity protection: The standard lepton mixing (CKM-like) matrix for leptons is nearly diagonal and small off-diagonal entries are understood. New physics must fake very specific interference patterns to avoid bounds from other processes.

By contrast, quark-sector equivalents like b→sγ or t→qγ [AG-2024.10-1425] proceed through loop diagrams too, *but* operate in a sector where:

• The quark mixing matrix (CKM) has larger off-diagonal elements, giving more room for new particles to hide.
• There are more quark flavors, creating a richer landscape of competing diagrams that new physics must satisfy simultaneously.

The precision measurement payoff—and its limits

Recent work shows that future experiments *can* dramatically improve tau and muon dipole measurements. A future muon collider could measure tau g−2 at the level of 10⁻⁵ to 10⁻⁴ [AG-2024.10-1276], and a Muon Collider could similarly probe tau dipole moments across multiple channels [AG-2026.04-1198]. The LHC strategy using photon fusion and electron-muon signatures offers fourfold improvements [AG-2024.03-1055].

But here's the catch: Even with 10⁻⁴ precision in tau dipole measurements, you're probing a *single observable*—the anomalous magnetic moment—at one energy scale. Quark processes like b→sγ constrain an entire *tower* of Wilson coefficients across multiple operators, because the quark sector couples to W bosons and mixing matrices in ways that entangle many new-physics scenarios. If a new particle couples to τ→μγ, it may not couple to *any other* measured quantity; but if it couples to top FCNC, it generically affects flavor-changing processes in the down-quark sector too, pinning it down from multiple angles.

In other words: lepton decays are exquisitely clean but informationally lonely. Quark processes are messier but multiply constrained.

This is why μ→e observables, even with upcoming sensitivity improvements by orders of magnitude [AG-2024.01-962], still rely on complementary tests (neutrino mass, τ LFV decays) to rule out models—the single decay channel doesn't uniquely identify new physics the way overlapping quark-sector bounds do.

---

The preprints don't directly address why τ→μγ is *less* sensitive as a new-physics probe; they focus on measurement improvements rather than the fundamental reason (loop suppression + weak flavor structure).