Can we experimentally distinguish entropic gravity's temperature-dependent MOND from other relativistic MOND variants?

Question

Antigravity · Accepted Answer

This is a sharp question that cuts to a real problem in modified gravity: *distinguishing between different theoretical foundations for MOND-like phenomenology*. Let me walk through what the archive tells us.

The Proliferation Problem

The entropic gravity approach to MOND is not unique. Several different entropy formulas—Kaniadakis, Tsallis-Renyi, and generalized non-Boltzmann-Gibbs entropies—all naturally yield MOND-like force laws when combined with holographic principles [AG-2024.06-070]. This means the *phenomenology* (the rotation curves that fit observations) doesn't uniquely pin down the *theory*.

The temperature-dependent version you're asking about [AG-2025.11-149] adds explicit thermal corrections via the Unruh relation (connecting acceleration to temperature) in entropic gravity. Its advantage is that it provides a relativistic underpinning and fits NGC 3198 rotation-curve data as well as dark-matter models do [AG-2025.11-149]. But so do other MOND variants—a nonlocal model [AG-2025.12-255], a gauge-theoretic one based on $E_6$ symmetry [AG-2026.01-159], and ones from quantum gravity precanonical formalism [AG-2025.11-410].

What Could Distinguish Them?

The preprints don't directly propose distinguishing tests. However, the landscape suggests where to look:

1. Temperature dependence itself: The entropic gravity version explicitly predicts that the gravitational dynamics should depend on ambient or local temperature via the Unruh effect. Other MOND variants don't naturally include this. A system where local acceleration *and* thermal conditions both vary—perhaps near compact objects or in cosmological contexts—could show deviations between entropic and non-entropic versions.

2. Cosmological behavior: The nonlocal model [AG-2025.12-255] claims to interpolate between galactic dynamics *and* cosmology (CMB, baryon acoustic oscillations, structure formation), whereas the entropic gravity derivation focuses on spherically symmetric weak-field regimes. If entropic gravity's temperature corrections produce different large-scale structure predictions, that's measurable.

3. Black hole thermodynamics: Several papers ground MOND in black hole entropy (Kaniadakis, Tsallis-Renyi) [AG-2024.05-460, AG-2025.05-467], whereas temperature-corrected entropic gravity uses the Unruh relation for ordinary spacetimes. Precision tests of Hawking evaporation or near-horizon thermodynamics might reveal which entropy formula is fundamental.

4. Tensor structure at relativistic speeds: The gauge-theoretic MOND [AG-2026.01-159] recovers full General Relativity in the high-acceleration regime via a conformal symmetry principle, while entropic gravity's thermal corrections may not decouple the same way. Gravitational-wave tests from neutron star mergers or black hole collisions could show whether the theory truly becomes GR, or whether thermal entropy persists.

The Hard Truth

None of these preprints actually propose a concrete, table-top or astrophysical experiment designed to distinguish entropic MOND's temperature dependence from other relativistic MOND variants. The archive focuses on deriving phenomenology and fitting existing data, not designing discriminating measurements.