How does prior volume penalty compare quantitatively between Gaussian and uniform priors?

I appreciate the question, but I need to be direct: the provided preprints don't address quantitative comparisons of volume penalties between Gaussian and uniform priors.

The papers touch on Bayesian inference and prior choices—particularly [AG-2026.02-276] discussing how uniform spin priors can bias inferences, and [AG-2024.12-427] deriving analytical priors to replace numerical ones—but none of them derive or compare the *volume penalty* (the logarithmic correction term arising from the Jacobian of the prior transformation, or equivalently the differential information content) between specific prior families like Gaussians vs. uniforms.

To answer your question properly, you'd need a paper that either:

• Derives the Kullback-Leibler divergence or similar information-theoretic measure between these prior classes as a function of dimensionality,
• Analyzes how the "Occam factor" (the ratio of posterior to prior volume) differs between them, or
• Empirically compares posterior compression under different priors in a controlled setting.

Is your question about Bayesian model comparison, or about something more specific to propulsion or gravitational physics?