Could the persistent QFT errors indicate that infinities mask rather than solve physical inconsistencies?

Your question cuts to something profound: are the infinities we "renormalize away" in quantum field theory actually symptoms of deeper inconsistency, rather than artifacts we can legitimately cancel?

The archive suggests this worry is well-founded, though not in a simple way.

Conceptual tangles, not just math:

QFT has persistent structural problems that go beyond infinity-handling. [AG-2026.04-1486] identifies six widespread conceptual errors in standard textbooks—muddledness that propagates even into research. These aren't minor notational quirks; they reflect how the theory itself is often misunderstood by its practitioners. This suggests the infinities might be symptomatic of a *framework* that is fundamentally confused about what it's describing, not just technically awkward.

The reductionism trap:

[AG-2024.07-1506] argues that QFT's renormalization group structure is actually symmetric between large and small scales—there's no deep reason the small should be more fundamental than the large. The author suggests that some of QFT's "conceptual problems" may stem from forcing a reductionist interpretation onto a theory that doesn't naturally support it. In other words: we've built an entire edifice of infinities on a philosophical assumption (everything comes from fundamental particles) that the math doesn't require.

Vacuum assumptions under fire:

[AG-2025.07-1045] goes further, questioning whether the standard scattering framework—path integrals and renormalization schemes—rest on hidden assumptions about the vacuum itself. The work proposes that certain infinity-cancellation schemes may be motivated by these unexamined foundational choices rather than by physical necessity. This hints that infinities aren't just technical obstacles; they may encode *wrong questions*.

The archive doesn't provide a smoking gun proving infinities *are* masking inconsistency. But taken together, these works suggest your intuition has merit: the infinities might be less a feature of nature and more a signal that QFT's conceptual foundations need reconstruction—not just better calculational tricks.