Computational Complexity

AG-2024.07-2399

cs.CC

Semi-Classical Subspaces, The No Synchronization Law, and More

Samuel Epstein

This paper looks at the intersection of algorithmic information theory and physics, namely quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and black holes. We discuss theorems which characterize the barrier between the quantum world and the classical realm. The notion of a ``semi-classical subspace'' is introduced. Partial signals and partial information cloning can be obtained on quantum states in semi-classical subspaces. The No Synchronization Law is detailed, which says separate and isolated physical systems evolving over time cannot have algorithmic thermodynamic entropies that are in synch. We look at future work involving the Kolmogorov complexity of black holes.

AG-2024.06-2224

cs.CC

Extensively Not P-Bi-Immune promiseBQP-Complete Languages

Andrew Jackson

In this paper, I first establish -- via methods other than the Gottesman-Knill theorem -- the existence of an infinite set of instances of simulating a quantum circuit to decide a decision problem that can be simulated classically. I then examine under what restrictions on quantum circuits the existence of infinitely many classically simulable instances persists. There turns out to be a vast number of such restrictions, and any combination of those found can be applied at the same time without eliminating the infinite set of classically simulable instances. Further analysis of the tools used in this then shows there exists a language that every (promise) BQP language is one-one reducible to. This language is also not P-bi-immune under very many promises.

AG-2024.05-2514

cs.CC

On Bounded Advice Classes

Simon Marshall, Casper Gyurik, Vedran Dunjko

Advice classes in computational complexity have frequently been used to model real-world scenarios encountered in cryptography, quantum computing and machine learning, where some computational task may be broken down into a preprocessing and deployment phase, each associated with a different complexity. However, in these scenarios, the advice given by the preprocessing phase must still be generated by some (albeit more powerful) bounded machine, which is not the case in conventional advice classes. To better model these cases we develop `bounded advice classes', where a more powerful Turing machine generates advice for another, less powerful, Turing machine. We then focus on the question of when various classes generate useful advice, to answer this we connect bounded advice to unary languages. This connection allows us to state various conditional and unconditional results on the utility of advice generated by $\mathsf{EXP}$, $\mathsf{NP}$, $\mathsf{BQP}$, $\mathsf{PSPACE}$, and more. We study the relations between bounded advice classes, quantum bounded advice classes, and randomised bounded advice. We also examine how each of these concepts interact with recently introduced classes, like $\mathsf{BPP/samp}$. Our results also improve the state of the art in existing research on the complexity of advice functions.

AG-2024.04-1966

cs.CC

Satisfiability of commutative vs. non-commutative CSPs

Andrei A. Bulatov, Stanislav Živný

The Mermin-Peres magic square is a celebrated example of a system of Boolean linear equations that is not (classically) satisfiable but is satisfiable via linear operators on a Hilbert space of dimension four. A natural question is then, for what kind of problems such a phenomenon occurs? Atserias, Kolaitis, and Severini answered this question for all Boolean Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs): For 0-Valid-SAT, 1-Valid-SAT, 2-SAT, Horn-SAT, and Dual Horn-SAT, classical satisfiability and operator satisfiability is the same and thus there is no gap; for all other Boolean CSPs, these notions differ as there are gaps, i.e., there are unsatisfiable instances that are satisfiable via operators on Hilbert spaces. We generalize their result to CSPs on arbitrary finite domains and give an almost complete classification: First, we show that NP-hard CSPs admit a separation between classical satisfiability and satisfiability via operators on finite- and infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Second, we show that tractable CSPs of bounded width have no satisfiability gaps of any kind. Finally, we show that tractable CSPs of unbounded width can simulate, in a satisfiability-gap-preserving fashion, linear equations over an Abelian group of prime order $p$; for such CSPs, we obtain a separation of classical satisfiability and satisfiability via operators on infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Furthermore, if $p=2$, such CSPs also have gaps separating classical satisfiability and satisfiability via operators on finite- and infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces.

AG-2024.03-1831

cs.CC

Even quantum advice is unlikely to solve PP

Justin Yirka

We give a corrected proof that if PP $\subseteq$ BQP/qpoly, then the Counting Hierarchy collapses, as originally claimed by [Aaronson 2006 arXiv:cs/0504048]. This recovers the related unconditional claim that PP does not have circuits of any fixed size $n^k$ even with quantum advice. We do so by proving that YQP*, an oblivious version of (QMA $\cap$ coQMA), is contained in APP, and so is PP-low.

AG-2024.02-1941

cs.CC

On the communication complexity of finding a king in a tournament

Nikhil S. Mande, Manaswi Paraashar, Swagato Sanyal, Nitin Saurabh

A tournament is a complete directed graph. A king in a tournament is a vertex v such that every other vertex is reachable from v via a path of length at most 2. It is well known that every tournament has at least one king, one of which is a maximum out-degree vertex. The tasks of finding a king, a maximum out-degree vertex and a source in a tournament has been relatively well studied in the context of query complexity. We study the communication complexity of these tasks, where the edges are partitioned between two players. The following are our main results for n-vertex tournaments: 1) The deterministic communication complexity of finding whether a source exists is tilde{Theta}(log^2 n). 2) The deterministic and randomized communication complexities of finding a king are Theta(n). The quantum communication complexity is tilde{Theta}(sqrt{n}). 3) The deterministic, randomized and quantum communication complexities of finding a maximum out-degree vertex are Theta(n log n), tilde{Theta}(n) and tilde{Theta}(sqrt{n}), respectively. Our upper bounds hold for all partitions of edges, and the lower bounds for a specific partition of the edges. To show the first bullet above, we show, perhaps surprisingly, that finding a source in a tournament is equivalent to the well-studied Clique vs. Independent Set (CIS) problem on undirected graphs. Our bounds for finding a source then follow from known bounds on the complexity of the CIS problem. In view of this equivalence, we can view the task of finding a king in a tournament to be a natural generalization of CIS. One of our lower bounds uses a fooling-set based argument, and all our other lower bounds follow from carefully-constructed reductions from Set-Disjointness.

AG-2024.02-1917

cs.CC

Locality Bounds for Sampling Hamming Slices

Daniel M. Kane, Anthony Ostuni, Kewen Wu

Spurred by the influential work of Viola (Journal of Computing 2012), the past decade has witnessed an active line of research into the complexity of (approximately) sampling distributions, in contrast to the traditional focus on the complexity of computing functions. We build upon and make explicit earlier implicit results of Viola to provide superconstant lower bounds on the locality of Boolean functions approximately sampling the uniform distribution over binary strings of particular Hamming weights, both exactly and modulo an integer, answering questions of Viola (Journal of Computing 2012) and Filmus, Leigh, Riazanov, and Sokolov (RANDOM 2023). Applications to data structure lower bounds and quantum-classical separations are discussed.

AG-2024.02-1861

cs.CC

Two Quantum Paradigms, but Still No Signal

Samuel Epstein

An overwhelming majority of quantum (pure and mixed) states, when undertaking a POVM measurement, will result in a classical probability with no algorithmic information. Thus most quantum states produce white noise when measured. Furthermore most non-pointer states, when undergoing the decoherence process, will produce white noise. These results can be seen as consequences of the vastness of Hilbert spaces.

AG-2024.02-1727

cs.CC

Quantum Automating $\mathbf{TC}^0$-Frege Is LWE-Hard

Noel Arteche, Gaia Carenini, Matthew Gray

We prove the first hardness results against efficient proof search by quantum algorithms. We show that under Learning with Errors (LWE), the standard lattice-based cryptographic assumption, no quantum algorithm can weakly automate $\mathbf{TC}^0$-Frege. This extends the line of results of Krajíček and Pudlák (Information and Computation, 1998), Bonet, Pitassi, and Raz (FOCS, 1997), and Bonet, Domingo, Gavaldà, Maciel, and Pitassi (Computational Complexity, 2004), who showed that Extended Frege, $\mathbf{TC}^0$-Frege and $\mathbf{AC}^0$-Frege, respectively, cannot be weakly automated by classical algorithms if either the RSA cryptosystem or the Diffie-Hellman key exchange protocol are secure. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first interaction between quantum computation and propositional proof search.

AG-2024.02-1472

cs.CC

Two Simple Proofs of Müller's Theorem

Samuel Epstein

Due to Müller's theorem, the Kolmogorov complexity of a string was shown to be equal to its quantum Kolmogorov complexity. Thus there are no benefits to using quantum mechanics to compress classical information. The quantitative amount of information in classical sources is invariant to the physical model used. These consequences make this theorem arguably the most important result in the intersection of algorithmic information theory and physics. The original proof is quite extensive. This paper contains two simple proofs of this theorem. This paper also contains new bounds for quantum Kolmogorov complexity with error.

AG-2024.01-1488

cs.CC

Quantum Time-Space Tradeoffs for Matrix Problems

Paul Beame, Niels Kornerup, Michael Whitmeyer

We consider the time and space required for quantum computers to solve a wide variety of problems involving matrices, many of which have only been analyzed classically in prior work. Our main results show that for a range of linear algebra problems -- including matrix-vector product, matrix inversion, matrix multiplication and powering -- existing classical time-space tradeoffs, several of which are tight for every space bound, also apply to quantum algorithms. For example, for almost all matrices $A$, including the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) matrix, we prove that quantum circuits with at most $T$ input queries and $S$ qubits of memory require $T=Ω(n^2/S)$ to compute matrix-vector product $Ax$ for $x \in \{0,1\}^n$. We similarly prove that matrix multiplication for $n\times n$ binary matrices requires $T=Ω(n^3 / \sqrt{S})$. Because many of our lower bounds match deterministic algorithms with the same time and space complexity, we show that quantum computers cannot provide any asymptotic advantage for these problems with any space bound. We obtain matching lower bounds for the stronger notion of quantum cumulative memory complexity -- the sum of the space per layer of a circuit. We also consider Boolean (i.e. AND-OR) matrix multiplication and matrix-vector products, improving the previous quantum time-space tradeoff lower bounds for $n\times n$ Boolean matrix multiplication to $T=Ω(n^{2.5}/S^{1/4})$ from $T=Ω(n^{2.5}/S^{1/2})$. Our improved lower bound for Boolean matrix multiplication is based on a new coloring argument that extracts more from the strong direct product theorem used in prior work. Our tight lower bounds for linear algebra problems require adding a new bucketing method to the recording-query technique of Zhandry that lets us apply classical arguments to upper bound the success probability of quantum circuits.

AG-2024.01-1307

cs.CC

Quantum Polynomial Hierarchies: Karp-Lipton, error reduction, and lower bounds

Avantika Agarwal, Sevag Gharibian, Venkata Koppula, Dorian Rudolph

The Polynomial-Time Hierarchy ($\mathsf{PH}$) is a staple of classical complexity theory, with applications spanning randomized computation to circuit lower bounds to ''quantum advantage'' analyses for near-term quantum computers. Quantumly, however, despite the fact that at least \emph{four} definitions of quantum $\mathsf{PH}$ exist, it has been challenging to prove analogues for these of even basic facts from $\mathsf{PH}$. This work studies three quantum-verifier based generalizations of $\mathsf{PH}$, two of which are from [Gharibian, Santha, Sikora, Sundaram, Yirka, 2022] and use classical strings ($\mathsf{QCPH}$) and quantum mixed states ($\mathsf{QPH}$) as proofs, and one of which is new to this work, utilizing quantum pure states ($\mathsf{pureQPH}$) as proofs. We first resolve several open problems from [GSSSY22], including a collapse theorem and a Karp-Lipton theorem for $\mathsf{QCPH}$. Then, for our new class $\mathsf{pureQPH}$, we show one-sided error reduction for $\mathsf{pureQPH}$, as well as the first bounds relating these quantum variants of $\mathsf{PH}$, namely $\mathsf{QCPH}\subseteq \mathsf{pureQPH} \subseteq \mathsf{EXP}^{\mathsf{PP}}$.